Social Media
In a recent incident in Kathmandu, an electric vehicle (EV) was seen emitting thick plumes of smoke while parked in a service area, quickly attracting widespread attention on social media. The Seres 3 EV was reportedly linked to unresolved technical issues, and the company stated that a short circuit caused the smoke.
Preliminary investigations suggest that the vehicle may have been serviced at unauthorized centers, which could have contributed to its technical difficulties. The company indicated that the smoke appeared while the EV was being taken for repairs. To support the ongoing investigation, technical experts from China are also expected to arrive.
While fires in electric vehicles are relatively rare, they often receive significant media coverage, reflecting the public's growing interest in EV technology. This incident is not isolated; previous cases, such as the fire involving an MG ZS EV in Budhanilkantha, Kathmandu, last January, also raised consumer concerns and sparked discussions about safety standards. A short circuit was identified as a potential factor. The MG ZS EV, known for its excellent features, also raised questions about potential aftermarket modifications made by the owner at unauthorized workshops.
It is crucial to recognize that electric vehicles are statistically less prone to catching fire compared to traditional gasoline-powered vehicles. According to industry data, EVs have a fire incident rate of about 0.03%, compared to 1.5% for gasoline vehicles. However, these incidents underscore significant safety concerns for the overall EV industry and its customers.
Abhisekh Karki, CEO and Head Engineer at Abhiyantriki Karmashala, an Engineering Research and Development firm focused on electric mobility and renewable energy, emphasizes that there are numerous misconceptions about the causes of EV fires.
He points out that thermal runaway—an uncontrolled temperature rise—can result from several factors such as physical damage, inadequate maintenance, or internal short circuits. Additional contributing elements include manufacturing defects and insufficient repairs. "Addressing these misconceptions is key to ensuring the consumers feel safe and confident in their choices," Karki emphasizes.
These incidents highlight the critical need for thorough and transparent investigations to identify their underlying causes. Understanding these root issues is vital for ensuring public safety and preserving consumer trust. When safety concerns are clearly communicated, it empowers buyers to make informed choices, especially as lesser-known brands increasingly enter the market.
Establishing a government committee dedicated to investigating these occurrences is essential, particularly since this marks only the second reported case.
Such oversight would signify a strong commitment to consumer protection and help create regulatory frameworks that prioritize safety and reliability in the electric vehicle sector. Moreover, it could establish standards for maintenance and repair practices, helping to prevent similar incidents in the future.
By fostering a culture of transparency and accountability, all stakeholders—including manufacturers, regulators, and consumers—can work collaboratively to improve the safety and dependability of electric vehicles. This collective effort would ultimately benefit consumers, fostering greater confidence in the evolving EV market.
As Nepal's EV market continues to grow, with an increasing number of brands entering the scene, it is imperative for all involved to prioritize safety. Consumers should stay informed about the maintenance practices for their vehicles, while manufacturers must ensure that they adhere to rigorous safety standards. Only through these efforts can we pave the way for a safer and more sustainable future in electric mobility.
